<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>From The Head Of Zeus Jones &#187; noun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/category/noun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog</link>
	<description>Using marketing to do things for people: Marketing As A Service.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Nouns, verbs and iPhone interface design.</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2008/nouns-verbs-and-iphone-interface-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2008/nouns-verbs-and-iphone-interface-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeusjones.sierrabravo.net/blog/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night, as I struggled through the iPhone&#8217;s clumsy contacts search, it struck me that the reason I still have difficulty with the interface after almost a year of usage is that Apple has deviated from the noun paradigm in the iPhone interface in a couple of important areas. In an interview with the NYT [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /><a style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_yA4UaMhIErk/SDRHHVuJVOI/AAAAAAAAAW8/VjEfH8iUx38/s1600-h/iphone-icons.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_yA4UaMhIErk/SDRHHVuJVOI/AAAAAAAAAW8/VjEfH8iUx38/s400/iphone-icons.png" alt="iphone icons Nouns, verbs and iPhone interface design." id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5202861660935116002" border="0" title="Nouns, verbs and iPhone interface design." /></a><br />Last night, as I struggled through the iPhone&#8217;s clumsy contacts search, it struck me that the reason I still have difficulty with the interface after almost a year of usage is that Apple has deviated from the noun paradigm in the iPhone interface in a couple of important areas. In an interview with the NYT in October 2007, Jobs was quoted as saying:</p>
<p>“People don’t understand that we’ve invented a new class of interface,” he said.</p>
<p>He contrasted it with stylus interfaces, like the approach Microsoft took with its tablet computer. That interface is not so different from what most computers have been using since the mid-1980s.</p>
<p>In contrast, Mr. Jobs said that multitouch drastically simplified the process of controlling a computer.</p>
<p>There are no “verbs” in the iPhone interface, he said, alluding to the way a standard mouse or stylus system works. In those systems, users select an object, like a photo, and then separately select an action, or “verb,” to do something to it.</p>
<p>While that&#8217;s true for many of the items like calendar, photos, maps etc. it&#8217;s not true for vital ones like SMS, Phone, and to some extent Mail. I consistently find myself going to a contact (noun) in order to send them an SMS (verb). Likewise I find it annoying that I have to go through phone (verb) in order to get to my contacts.</p>
<p>While this is apparently due to be remedied in the 2.0 interface, I was thinking that multitouch opens up a bunch of new opportunities to take the noun-verb paradigm even further by allowing verbs to be accessed through gestures.</p>
<p>For example swiping a contact could send them a text, while double tapping could send them an email. Searching through contacts could be performed by gestures, imagine writing a &#8220;v&#8221; with your fingers to navigate to V in your contacts list. This line of thinking allows for some other simplifications (or condensing).</p>
<p>Camera can be a verb of photos; clock a verb of calendar and so on. While this scheme might not fit everyone,  it could be an advanced customisation feature available to advanced users.</p>
<p>In case you couldn&#8217;t tell I&#8217;m a bit eager for June 9th?<br /></span><span style="color: rgb(255, 255, 255);font-size:100%;" ></span></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.01 -->

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
<h2  class="related_post_title">Random Posts</h2><ul class="related_post"><li><a href="http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2007/brands-don%e2%80%99t-separate-products%e2%80%a6/" title="Brands don’t separate products…">Brands don’t separate products…</a></li><li><a href="http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2007/update-its-looking-good-3/" title="Update: it&#8217;s looking good.">Update: it&#8217;s looking good.</a></li><li><a href="http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2008/the-role-of-product-launches/" title="The role of product launches.">The role of product launches.</a></li><li><a href="http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2008/aoc2-october-29-2008-the-launch/" title="AOC2. October 29, 2008. The launch!">AOC2. October 29, 2008. The launch!</a></li><li><a href="http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2010/changed-perceptions-are-the-result-of-changed-behaviour/" title="Changed perceptions are the result of changed behaviour.">Changed perceptions are the result of changed behaviour.</a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2008/nouns-verbs-and-iphone-interface-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
