The value in context.

138657496 f3c499346a o The value in context.

Image via: http://www.flickr.com/photos/thewavingcat/

A few weeks ago, my wife and I were chatting about something or other and it occurred to us that one of the crucial things that sometimes gets overlooked when talking about the spread of information through networks is that people and machines are different. While a computer, router or switch can pass information along relatively untouched, it’s almost impossible for people to do the same. People inherently add something in communicating information which adjusts the meaning of that information slightly. So while machines transmit information, people transmit meaning. (Faris had a great snippet to this effect on his blog the other day.)

People add emotional context to information, and increasingly it’s this context that we’re finding value in. I think this is why Twitter search is gaining so much steam. In fact, to continue a theme I wrote about a little while ago, it seems to me that we are becoming less willing to pay for information but we are becoming more willing to pay for someone to provide context to that information.

Context is actually how we determine value. In Predictably Irrational which I’m currently reading, Dan Ariely talks about this as one of the reasons why we make bad decisions. In one of his examples he points out that we’d be willing to take a trip to save $8 on an $18 pen, but unwilling to take the same trip to save $8 on a $448 suit.

Given the importance and power of context, it’s surprising then how infrequently it is discussed as a goal of marketing. It seems to me that providing context is one of the most valuable things we can do as marketers.

  • Context for how a product or service fits into your life
  • Context for how a product or service fits into the marketplace
  • Context for understanding different pieces of information
  • Context for where you fit in the world
  • Etc.

I think that part of where the trouble lies is that we often see the job of marketing as disseminating information. If you accept the framework I’ve laid out above, all this does is leaves the job of providing context for that information to someone else – your customers or possibly even your competition. In order to provide context, you have to start with understanding what people already know and work to figure out how to provide more information that helps them put that information into a different context rather than simply challenging that information head on with a new piece of information.

Random Posts

  • Thanks Chris, much appreciated. It's true, media is the one place where context is the driving factor but isn't it more often the case that it's simply context for "the big idea" that's being sought rather than context for the product/service/brand? However, I do think you raise an interesting opportunity for agencies to apply "media thinking" more broadly. If you separate media thinking from communications entirely and make it a context-creating discipline, I think you could probably open up some really cool areas.
  • As a professional focused on "online media" context is all I think about. Context is THE big problem that we as marketers have with distributed digital experiences (sponsorships, banners, YouTube videos, brands living in social media, appication, etc...).

    Media professionals are trained to think about everything but context. Reach. Price. Audience. Response. But context transcends all of these measures. If you place an idea where is it ready for someone to receive it - small numbers of people "pay out". You pay the premium. You "ignore" the audience. You guarantee response.

    Bravo -- love reading your stuff, always make me think. Keep up the great work.
  • @Andrew, great presentations and yet another place where our discussion of things versus their relationship or context fail us. Thanks for the links, really helpful.
  • I've been obsessing on this 'context' thing for a while. In case you're interested here are a couple of links:
    http://www.slideshare.net/andrewhinton/theconte...
    http://www.slideshare.net/andrewhinton/beyond-f...
    I've been preaching this context thing to the IA/UX crowd, saying that's what the hyperlink added to the world -- a radical departure from the assumptions we inherited about contextual experience. Which of course has everything to do with what you're talking about here. Now that context has collapsed (or been so thoroughly remixed) people expect us to engage them as if we're *there* and we get them, where they are ... because if they can be everywhere, why can't we?
  • @Brian, great point, absolutely agree
  • Juan Pablo
    Great, value and meaning within the same context.
  • Very good points. I might add that context can also be non-informational in nature. A brand can provide a context in which its customers can create their own contexts. The brand provides the framework, the tools and the opportunities to let a thousand contexts bloom. The goal is not to contain or control these contexts, but to nourish them, as they'll inevitably lead to new markets.
  • nice one dude. predictably irrational is completely awesome.

    it's a bit like the geotility and contextility ideas i was messing around with - making data useful for what you are doing is the big leap.
blog comments powered by Disqus