Great ideas: platforms for value creation v. platforms for creative executions?

780343989 f69fde96ac b Great ideas: platforms for value creation v. platforms for creative executions?

Via: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jorgeq82/

One of the themes that occupied my mind in 2008 and continues to intrigue me is how things can have a number of different value streams associated with them. You may recall, I wrote that a simple penny coin can have four (or more) different dimensions of value, from its face value, the value of its materials, the cost of its production, and so on.

The point here is that value is not an absolute, it is entirely dependent upon context. Therefore by examining an object from a variety of different contexts you can discover very different scales of value.

I think the same is true for marketing ideas. The best marketing ideas have multiple dimensions of value. The best ideas create value for the company AND the customer. It’s entirely possible create value beyond even these two audiences. Great marketing ideas also create value for shareholders, communities and potentially, the planet.

Nowhere is this more evident than in the area of “Green” marketing. I’m not necessarily talking about big, hairy initiatives, but rather small steps companies can take to reduce their impact upon the environment.

Consider Apple’s (yes I know them again) move to replace printed receipts in its stores with emailed receipts. There are a large number of value streams associated with this one action.

Customers gain convenience and better archiving from having a digital (e.g. searchable) record of their purchase. They also gain an easily shareable (e.g. for expenses or for sending to friends) record of their actions. And then finally, they also get the (small) emotional reward of having helped to reduce litter and waste.

Apple gets your email address, which as many marketers know is a pretty reliable revenue stream. They gain from any sharing of your purchases that you might now be able to do. They gain from the reduction of cost of printing, ink, paper, waste management etc. And they gain by being seen as a company that’s doing its bit to help.

The planet gets…well lets just say every little bit helps.

If marketing is, as the AMA states, an “…an organizational function and a set of processes for creating, communicating and delivering value to customers and for managing customer relationships in ways that benefit the organization and its stakeholders,” then emailed receipts qualifies as a brilliant marketing idea on all accounts.

It’s examples like this that have forced me to shift my thinking on what is great marketing and what is a great idea. Where we (me and my partners) used to judge an idea based upon its ability to create a large number of extensions to be a central jumping-off point or platform for a number of different coordinated or coherent activities. We now judge the quality of an idea by its ability to create a large number of value streams.

These two frameworks don’t necessarily have to be incompatible but they often are. In our eagerness to extend an idea into multiple channels or forms, I think it’s increasingly important to ask whether we are we actually creating more value or simply making everything we do less valuable?

As an industry, I also think we also ought to ask why ideas like Apple’s printed receipts aren’t awarded, yet extravagant uses of time, money and resources that (often) generate very little value for anyone but media company owners are?

Random Posts

  • 'The best ideas create value for the company AND the customer'
    exactamundo.
    this the same value creation mantra we are working to at my gaff for 09.
    good work fella.
    E
  • Thanks Eaon!
  • the emailed receipts are genius - i don't understand why everyone doesn't do it - so much easier and you CAN'T LOSE THEM.

    but absolutely mate - value is entirely contextual and social and constructed and that.

    Things only have value because we decide they do, and the same thing in different contexts can have the opposite value.

    We exist in overlapping value situations - often social and commercial - where a 10 dollar note has value in buying a burger a McDonalds but negative value when offered as payment should a friend cook you one.

    Now - is there a value utilitarian position - the ideas that create the most value for the most people are the best?

    ROCKON>
    Faris
  • Too often the "industry" awards clever communication/execution rather than brilliant ideas. In the formative years at Fallon (I was there from years 3-8) awards were the currency all agencies were judged on. The formula for personal and agency success: do cool ads, win awards. get famous. get more clients... While we (the industry) have a seeming unbridled need for approval and adulation, it's about time awards are granted for real marketing ideas like Apple's receipts. Maybe if the One Show considered "value creation" it's main criteria for measuring/awarding greatness, we'd start to see more ideas that truly benefit companies and consumers.
    Nice work -Rob
  • I couldn't agree more with your updated definition of what makes a good idea - with a minor tweak. I think an idea that generates at least one positive value stream without creating any negative value streams is a viable idea that deserves to be pursued.

    In the emailed bill example, even if it only saved Apple printing and material cost it'd still be a great idea - simply because, that positive benefit isn't being generated by spending money (often the problem when we approve ideas that require media spending) or by requiring greater effort or inconvenience from its customers.

    Placing the stress on multiple value streams runs the risk of ignoring perfectly viable ideas that deliver just one value stream - but do it well.
  • Adam Ronich
    Over the holidays I went into an Apple store bought a hard drive and had the receipt emailed to me. Fist off, I was impressed by the easy and convenience of the process, a remote credit card swiper and emailed receipt. No lines, check out right at the product. I was happy to give them my email address because it's Apple and they have it anyway (it's a .mac). I don't know if I'd be as open with this option with a McDonalds, BP or Barnes & Noble. It has to be a purchase big enough with a place I trust enough. Plus I'm not sure I want my email full or receipts. Now if Apple created an app that identified receipts and filed them electronicaly in a folder for me, that would change things.

    From an emotional side, it's cool because it seems more personal and for some reason less of a transaction. It's a confidence thing, like they're more open to contact after the purchase in case I'd have a problem with anything. It's what I expect from Apple.
  • Ciaran McCabe
    The creation of multiple value streams is both spot on and very timely.
    Great post.
  • Thanks for the comments everyone, makes me wonder whether we ought to create our own awards program that does award value. Would be a great ad for what marketing is capable I think. Any interest?

    @blaiq agree, it's not the number of value streams but it's the quality of value that's returned. My observation was that great ideas tend to work on many levels. I sort of feel that I can tell an idea is really good if it keeps getting better as it gets thought through further.
  • like the idea of an awards program, cool!
  • I guess I am a little more cynical than you. Apple is co-opting a cultural phenomenon. It has nothing to do with being green, and everything to do with collecting email addresses. Don't get me wrong, good for them. It's a great idea. But this is a tried and true marketing strategy. Thomas Frank wrote about it in "The Conquest of Cool." I also included it in my 10 year old Masters thesis. http://www.johnhaake.com/Thesis.html
  • brian
    there's another meta-value in effect with the recent experience delivery @ Apple retail - the displacement of a central location with a multiplicity of engagement sites. for the transaction, there's no check-out area; instead my transaction moment is portable, intimate and personalized to my location in the store. mimicing the transactional moment, the receipt moment flows as to how I want to reference my purchase - physical paper receipts, email receipts - or both. displacing the centrality of location across these experiential domains isn't just cool - it gives Apple a greater (permission based) flexibility to be present in more places, in more contexts, and in more forms. so yeah - communications value isn't just what you say - it's also WHERE you say it.
  • Good stuff. I agree on two counts...

    First, that electronic receipts are a great idea. It was something I touched on briefly late last year in this post... http://mattjonesblog.typepad.com/think_story_ex...

    Second, that this kind of thinking should absolutely be embraced and celebrated for the innovative, creative marketing it is. In fact, you could argue that it's the glossy ads that should be omitted from awards categories, not super-smart bits of low-cost, high-value thinking.
  • @brian right I forgot about the no-cash-register effect. I wrote a bit about that a while back but I agree that was genius. Transformed register people from reactive to pro-active salespeople.
  • I agree that value is contextual, but "multiple dimensions of value" feels like a messy way to think about this. sure, Apple's replacement of printed receipts with electronic ones helps consumers, Apple, and the planet, but it hurts the 'receipt industry' (producers of ink, paper; you get the idea). and sure it helps the planet, but zero paper waste does not = wholeheartedly sustainable (electronic still consumes energy, etc., sustainability can be defined by many different criteria; again you get the idea). so I guess I consider this more of a trade-off between values. value to whom? (consumers vs. receipt manufacturers.) value in terms of what? (paper waste vs. energy consumption.)

    then again I'm in the middle of eating lunch so before unleashing any verdict, perhaps I should chew on rice and garbanzo beans less and chew on this more...
  • Mark Dunn
    Exactly right...Haake sees right through it...

    "Apple is co-opting a cultural phenomenon. It has nothing to do with being green, and everything to do with collecting email addresses."

    I'm amazed that so many are easily duped by the 'green' disengenuity. If Apple really wanted to be green they'd give you a code to look the receipt up on their receipt website.

    Not cynical...just more aware of the true nature of email marketing ploys.
  • @John and @Mark

    I don't think Apple used receipts to claim they were more green, they did it for a bunch of reasons which I think we've discussed. Wouldn't we want to reward companies that take steps even if they are small ones?
blog comments powered by Disqus