<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Culture, the last advantage of the company?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kobe Bryant Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Kobe Bryant Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the write&#039;s

unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go those Wisdominthemind.com &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elegance-is-edgy-dress.com&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Elegance-is-Edgy-Dress.com &lt;/a&gt;

sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the write&#8217;s</p>
<p>unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go those Wisdominthemind.com <a href="http://www.elegance-is-edgy-dress.com"  rel="nofollow">Elegance-is-Edgy-Dress.com </a></p>
<p>sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what consumes me &#187; Blog Archive title here</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>what consumes me &#187; Blog Archive title here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-729</guid>
		<description>[...] definitely worth a read. It’s another example of why Netflix is so successful – because they haven’t left culture to chance. Additionally it’s also a great example of a favourite theme of mine – operations as marketing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] definitely worth a read. It’s another example of why Netflix is so successful – because they haven’t left culture to chance. Additionally it’s also a great example of a favourite theme of mine – operations as marketing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what consumes me, bud caddell &#187; New Marketing in action: Netflix.</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>what consumes me, bud caddell &#187; New Marketing in action: Netflix.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-728</guid>
		<description>[...] definitely worth a read. It’s another example of why Netflix is so successful – because they haven’t left culture to chance. Additionally it’s also a great example of a favourite theme of mine – operations as marketing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] definitely worth a read. It’s another example of why Netflix is so successful – because they haven’t left culture to chance. Additionally it’s also a great example of a favourite theme of mine – operations as marketing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Marketing in action: Netflix. &#124; From The Head Of Zeus Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>New Marketing in action: Netflix. &#124; From The Head Of Zeus Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-727</guid>
		<description>[...] worth a read. It&#8217;s another example of why Netflix is so successful &#8211; because they haven&#8217;t left culture to chance. Additionally it&#8217;s also a great example of a favourite theme of mine &#8211; operations as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] worth a read. It&#8217;s another example of why Netflix is so successful &#8211; because they haven&#8217;t left culture to chance. Additionally it&#8217;s also a great example of a favourite theme of mine &#8211; operations as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wednesday Round Up #57 &#171; Neuroanthropology</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>Wednesday Round Up #57 &#171; Neuroanthropology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-726</guid>
		<description>[...] the Head of Zeus Jones, Culture, The Last Advantage of the Company? Companies versus collectives – the ability to celebrate differences while engaging in a community [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Head of Zeus Jones, Culture, The Last Advantage of the Company? Companies versus collectives – the ability to celebrate differences while engaging in a community [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funny you should ask &#187; the great disconnect</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>funny you should ask &#187; the great disconnect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-725</guid>
		<description>[...] from positioning statements or brand values that companies strive for. That&#8217;s backwards. In a blog post over at Zeus a while back, there was some great and true thinking about company culture. This for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from positioning statements or brand values that companies strive for. That&#8217;s backwards. In a blog post over at Zeus a while back, there was some great and true thinking about company culture. This for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Communities: Human, all too human. &#171; Social Media Marketing, Thoughts, Facts &#38; Data</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Communities: Human, all too human. &#171; Social Media Marketing, Thoughts, Facts &#38; Data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-724</guid>
		<description>[...] yes&#8230;communities have bits of consciousness now. Of course they&#8217;re missing something as Adrian said and Dominic reinforced through his comment: &#8220;On the coordination: I don’t know how you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yes&#8230;communities have bits of consciousness now. Of course they&#8217;re missing something as Adrian said and Dominic reinforced through his comment: &#8220;On the coordination: I don’t know how you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kulturell tillhörighet och arbete - ∴ Johan Loman</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Kulturell tillhörighet och arbete - ∴ Johan Loman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-723</guid>
		<description>[...] Zeus Jones diskuterar man &#8220;kultur&#8221; som den sists existerande fördelen hos företag som vi känner dem i dag. Alla andra faktorer som tidigare varit centrala [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Zeus Jones diskuterar man &#8220;kultur&#8221; som den sists existerande fördelen hos företag som vi känner dem i dag. Alla andra faktorer som tidigare varit centrala [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links - 8th March 2009 &#171; Curiously Persistent</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Links - 8th March 2009 &#171; Curiously Persistent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 15:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-722</guid>
		<description>[...] Ho looks at the role culture plays in companies and self-organised [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ho looks at the role culture plays in companies and self-organised [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Ho</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-721</guid>
		<description>Hi Dominique,

Group strategy probably leads to a bad place but I think that most self-organised groups have taken their lead from a few key people - e.g. in Linux 1 - so all it takes is one individual with a great idea that he or she wants to give away and then you&#039;re off.

In terms of money, IP and that sort of stuff, those probably go counter to the spirit of most self-formed groups. Money isn&#039;t a motivator for participation, recognition is. Self-formed groups would almost certainly do work under some type of open licence which specifically prevents the commercialisation of the work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dominique,</p>
<p>Group strategy probably leads to a bad place but I think that most self-organised groups have taken their lead from a few key people &#8211; e.g. in Linux 1 &#8211; so all it takes is one individual with a great idea that he or she wants to give away and then you&#8217;re off.</p>
<p>In terms of money, IP and that sort of stuff, those probably go counter to the spirit of most self-formed groups. Money isn&#8217;t a motivator for participation, recognition is. Self-formed groups would almost certainly do work under some type of open licence which specifically prevents the commercialisation of the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominique</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>dominique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article.

- On the coordination: I don&#039;t know how you build a strategy using self organized group. It seems to me as these organizations are better for &quot;response&quot; type of action and &quot;counter power&quot;.
Opensource has shown some interesting things with this regards but I&#039;m not sure we&#039;re at a point where a self organised group could come up with let&#039;s say the new iPod.

I also think that so far, self organized group has not shown much ability to deal with money, IP  and power to name a few.... but banks have not been very good at this either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article.</p>
<p>- On the coordination: I don&#8217;t know how you build a strategy using self organized group. It seems to me as these organizations are better for &#8220;response&#8221; type of action and &#8220;counter power&#8221;.<br />
Opensource has shown some interesting things with this regards but I&#8217;m not sure we&#8217;re at a point where a self organised group could come up with let&#8217;s say the new iPod.</p>
<p>I also think that so far, self organized group has not shown much ability to deal with money, IP  and power to name a few&#8230;. but banks have not been very good at this either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Ho</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-719</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve brought an interesting dimension to this Ed. I agree that the boundaries of &quot;the company&quot; are losing definition, and in fact I think the company that first figures out how to combine the cohesiveness of a tightly defined internal culture with the ability to mobilise groups of people on the outside will make a killing in whatever field they&#039;re in. I wonder though if that will be achieved by loosening internal culture or by simply choosing to expose only certain parts of it externally. It&#039;s a pretty interesting question though and I don&#039;t believe anyone&#039;s solved it yet.

To your point about strong cultures stifling creativity, I think about a company like Zappos that has a well publicised induction ritual of offering new employees money to leave. From the outside that culture appears to be stronger and more comprehensive than even Microsoft&#039;s yet it clearly has created an innovative company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve brought an interesting dimension to this Ed. I agree that the boundaries of &#8220;the company&#8221; are losing definition, and in fact I think the company that first figures out how to combine the cohesiveness of a tightly defined internal culture with the ability to mobilise groups of people on the outside will make a killing in whatever field they&#8217;re in. I wonder though if that will be achieved by loosening internal culture or by simply choosing to expose only certain parts of it externally. It&#8217;s a pretty interesting question though and I don&#8217;t believe anyone&#8217;s solved it yet.</p>
<p>To your point about strong cultures stifling creativity, I think about a company like Zappos that has a well publicised induction ritual of offering new employees money to leave. From the outside that culture appears to be stronger and more comprehensive than even Microsoft&#8217;s yet it clearly has created an innovative company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Cotton</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Cotton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-718</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s something very interesting here about the evolving role of internal culture. I feel strong internal cultures have always defined strong brands, but i feel that might have to change with a new generation of workers.

I think of places like Cisco, Google and Nokia who have injected lots of flexibility and empowerment into their organizations by loosening their corporate cultures.

Other companies have had issues because of their overbearing culture- Microsoft being an obvious example.

The new model of C21st corporate culture will be one that allows internal and external collectives to thrive. They will certainly need energy, passion and drive to fire up employees, but they can&#039;t do it in such an over-bearing way.

In addition, when the boundaries between fulltime, part time, project worker and prosumer, blur, that flexibility and something akin to a collective mindset will be demanded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s something very interesting here about the evolving role of internal culture. I feel strong internal cultures have always defined strong brands, but i feel that might have to change with a new generation of workers.</p>
<p>I think of places like Cisco, Google and Nokia who have injected lots of flexibility and empowerment into their organizations by loosening their corporate cultures.</p>
<p>Other companies have had issues because of their overbearing culture- Microsoft being an obvious example.</p>
<p>The new model of C21st corporate culture will be one that allows internal and external collectives to thrive. They will certainly need energy, passion and drive to fire up employees, but they can&#8217;t do it in such an over-bearing way.</p>
<p>In addition, when the boundaries between fulltime, part time, project worker and prosumer, blur, that flexibility and something akin to a collective mindset will be demanded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee maicon</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2009/culture-the-last-advantage-of-the-company/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>lee maicon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/?p=898#comment-717</guid>
		<description>adrian,

selfishly this is great timing.  @ the new agency we&#039;ve been thinking about how to articulate what we stand for. a few years ago the question would be &#039;how are we positioned?&#039;
 we&#039;ve come to the conclusion that our positioning is far less important than our philosophy and culture.

the reality upon which that positioning is based may shift and leave us behind.  a shared philosophy and culture will be far more helpful to help us grow, innovate and challenge the conventions of agencyland (especially hispanic market agencyland)

i agree re: your implication that this will impact the role and skills required to be an agency/marketing partner.  All we can do is think through what it means to operate from a philosophy that creates behavior as opposed to having a set &#039;positioning&#039; that limits and defines behavior.

An analogy: &quot;Spanish&quot; identity in Spain (or the French, or the Germans may be a better analogy) has always been defined by a set geography and shared history and cultural cues.  Over the last 20 years as the EU has grown and immigrants from Latin America, Africa and even God forbid the UK have flooded Spain, it&#039;s put pressure on what that identity means. Their &quot;Spanish&quot; positioning has had some difficulty adapting.

Now not that we&#039;re perfect by any stretch, but over time the &quot;American/US&quot; identity has always been as much a philosophy as a positioning. My father growing up in Mexico was always really an American, because he bought into a certain set of values: meritocracy, tolerance, progress, etc. (You could argue that the Brits were good at exporting Britishness to the upper classes throughout Empire. cf., Naipaul VS)

Might not be the tightest analogy, but I think it&#039;s instructive.

But now I&#039;ve taken over your blog, haven&#039;t I? Bad form...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adrian,</p>
<p>selfishly this is great timing.  @ the new agency we&#8217;ve been thinking about how to articulate what we stand for. a few years ago the question would be &#8216;how are we positioned?&#8217;<br />
 we&#8217;ve come to the conclusion that our positioning is far less important than our philosophy and culture.</p>
<p>the reality upon which that positioning is based may shift and leave us behind.  a shared philosophy and culture will be far more helpful to help us grow, innovate and challenge the conventions of agencyland (especially hispanic market agencyland)</p>
<p>i agree re: your implication that this will impact the role and skills required to be an agency/marketing partner.  All we can do is think through what it means to operate from a philosophy that creates behavior as opposed to having a set &#8216;positioning&#8217; that limits and defines behavior.</p>
<p>An analogy: &#8220;Spanish&#8221; identity in Spain (or the French, or the Germans may be a better analogy) has always been defined by a set geography and shared history and cultural cues.  Over the last 20 years as the EU has grown and immigrants from Latin America, Africa and even God forbid the UK have flooded Spain, it&#8217;s put pressure on what that identity means. Their &#8220;Spanish&#8221; positioning has had some difficulty adapting.</p>
<p>Now not that we&#8217;re perfect by any stretch, but over time the &#8220;American/US&#8221; identity has always been as much a philosophy as a positioning. My father growing up in Mexico was always really an American, because he bought into a certain set of values: meritocracy, tolerance, progress, etc. (You could argue that the Brits were good at exporting Britishness to the upper classes throughout Empire. cf., Naipaul VS)</p>
<p>Might not be the tightest analogy, but I think it&#8217;s instructive.</p>
<p>But now I&#8217;ve taken over your blog, haven&#8217;t I? Bad form&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

