An Open Letter to Amazon.com pt. 1

Dear Amazon.com:

Wow. What’s it been, a decade of buying books from you? That’s amazing. You are probably the only brand with which I’ve had that long and consistent of a relationship.

All things considered it’s been great. So great that I was among the first in virtual line on Monday to pre-order a Kindle 2.

However, when I look back at my last ten or so years of buying books from you, surprisingly little has changed.

I know it’s easy to criticize in a vacuum, but I love books so much that I can’t help but offer a few thoughts and suggestions.

With the entire book industry going through layoffs and generally just falling apart, you have a huge opportunity on your hands to not only evolve how people buy and consume books, but how books come to market and authors promote themselves.

I follow many of my favorite authors on Twitter. I also read their blogs. Why? Because I’m hungry for more information about what is going on in their lives and what’s in their heads. A lot of my interest is related to news regarding new publications and releases, but I also want to know what other authors they are reading. When they post their reading recommendations I buy them religiously. Usually from your site.

I know that you’ve tried things like author videos for book launches in the past, but I think they were too few and far between to create awareness and habit among your consumers. A few high profile authors posting videos on a site that contains hundreds of thousands of books isn’t the way to usher in a new paradigm for book launches. The chances of someone stumbling across one and being interested enough to watch it is too slim.

Instead what if you created an integrated platform for authors to communicate and interact with their audiences? You’ve already begun creating “author pages” for some of your more popular selling writers. Instead of having this just be a page with all of their releases, why not open at least part of this page up to be a communication platform for writers?

Why would authors participate? Authors have already embraced new ways of promoting themselves and their books. Their audiences have shown they are interested in interacting with them. Certainly author blogs and twitter feeds haven’t hit the mainstream, but that is in large part an awareness problem. With the built in traffic you have coming to your site, these self-promotional efforts would be greatly amplified immediately. Your site has the power to make these author/audience social interactions mainstream.

What’s in it for you?  Besides the obvious advantage of having authors create content for you and promote their own books, authors like George Pelecanos have shown they would discuss a lot more than just their own books. As I’ve previously said I  (and I’m sure plenty of others) consider my favorite author’s recommendations solid gold. Pelecanos is great at providing a running list of whatever he is reading, but also frequently recommends music and movies as well. Can you imagine having authors cross sell not only books, but also movies and music for you?

Which brings us to the larger issue of how books are recommended on your site.

Certainly you’ve mastered the whole recommendation engine thing. There are few sites, if any, that do it better. However, algorithmic recommendations have become less and less relevant as social media has come into prominence.

Listmania has for a long time been your version of peer recommendations. Listmania was great when it first came out, but now it has devolved to something I consider closer to spam. There are so many lists compiled by so many anonymous people whose opinions I often don’t trust or disagree with that they have basically become useless to me.

What I would find more meaningful is getting recommendations and inspiration from a smaller set of people. More like a social shopping model, or the Netflix Friends functionality, I would like to have a few trusted people that have extremely similar buying habits that I can then “follow” and interact with.

Once, about five years ago I accidentally clicked into a feature where I could browse the entire purchase history of an anonymous fellow shopper whose buying habits were similar to mine. That functional door quickly slammed shut, probably for privacy reasons, but the glimpse of it that I had showed me the power of delving deeper into the shopping habits of my peers and left me wanting more.

A social shopping/friends functionality like this could work in concert with the “Customers Who Bought This Item also Bought” functionality you already have, but take it a level deeper. The “Customers Who Bought” feature is useful to a certain point, but often recommends books that are too close in, i.e. books that I already know about or have, or offers up recommendations that stray outside my area of interest. Allowing me to more closely align myself with users that have a stronger connection to my own interests would certainly get me spending more time on your site and buying more books, music, and movies.

Continued in Part 2: More Thoughts on Community & Wishing for a Better Wish List

Random Posts

  • Hi Paul, credits to Eric for this post, and if you want to check out his book selection sign up on Goodreads, I think he shares it all there.
  • hi Adrian, i'm late getting to this, but great post. funny how amazon are so functional when they could be so much more. do you have a list of books you'd recommend by the way?

    Paul
  • Adrian,

    You probably saw Seth Godin's blog today with recommendations to Amazon. (http://is.gd/kNnn)

    I immediately thought of this letter you wrote and thought I might pass it along.
  • are you actually gonna send this? if so, awesome, and please post any reply.
  • Another insightful post, Adrian. Brings to mind iTunes and the celebrity playlist, too. Is this a model for creative content providers like Amazon and iTunes?

    Do consumers pay as much creedence to their musicians' recommendations as they do authors?

    Jake
  • Jodi- I agree that writers may have a problem tying themselves to one vendor, even if it is the biggest one in the game. I didn't want to go into all the details here, but I think setting up a Friend Feed-like model where the Amazon pages were making use and raising the profile of current self-promotional efforts would be best. That would certainly make it easier for people to engage.

    I think writers and publishers are desperate for a new way. I've showed up at Borders readings for NYTimes best selling authors where 5-7 partially interested people who happened to be in the store wandered in and that was the extent of the audience.

    It will certainly be interesting to see how things evolve. And I certainly hope they do evolve because the percentage of people who actually read books in this country is already abysmal.
  • very smart stuff here adrian. makes me really rethink the power of the "follow" when applied to a niche category/behaviour. you should send this open letter to twitter too, see if they can figure out how to do multiple streams from one user, make those findable, then plug that in to amazon. or something along those lines!
  • Even though I am kind of a Kindle poo-pooer, I have to say this is my favorite thing I've read on the internet all day.

    I'm a die-hard Amazon devotee, and would love to see some of the features you mention here incorporated into the site. As it is now, I get most of my suggestions and such from book blogs and the people who write them and merely use Amazon as a store.

    I do wonder if authors (and by extensions publishers) would take a shine to such a close relationship with one seller. A lot of writers (and publishers) are woefully technologically inept (visit most any publishers' website for a gander at how much they don't get the web), and just don't know where to begin when it comes to interacting with readers online.
blog comments powered by Disqus