<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The return of the x-Internet.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2008/the-return-of-the-x-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2008/the-return-of-the-x-internet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2008/the-return-of-the-x-internet/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeusjones.sierrabravo.net/blog/?p=254#comment-268</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree, I think things are going to get better for users and that&#039;s what matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree, I think things are going to get better for users and that&#8217;s what matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helge Tennø</title>
		<link>http://www.zeusjones.com/blog/2008/the-return-of-the-x-internet/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Helge Tennø</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeusjones.sierrabravo.net/blog/?p=254#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Excellent reference to Forrester (thx), but I find that the browser is (at present) to clunky an interface to meet with the richness of our diverse interactions when using such different tools/software as we are today.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The best solution I imagine is to remove the &quot;one GUI to rule them all&quot;-principle of the browser and let each operation (software with unique preference) create it&#039;s own optimal interface and after that - open it up to server based activity. (which would be the same as allowing Keynote or Photoshop to work online).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As Forrester says: The browser is a page-by-page sequential way of browsing information, combine that with it&#039;s lack of memory (except the back button of the browser), and the un-human way of how you communicate with it&#039;s content (step-by-step, where everything else around us happens in motion) - we have to come up with better solutions. (Photosynth&#039;s guardian example (show at TED) has some very interesting concepts)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I personally hope Gears, AIR and Silverlight is a step in the right direction. At the moment more exited about the possibilities than worried about Microsoft :o)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks again for excellent post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent reference to Forrester (thx), but I find that the browser is (at present) to clunky an interface to meet with the richness of our diverse interactions when using such different tools/software as we are today.</p>
<p>The best solution I imagine is to remove the &#8220;one GUI to rule them all&#8221;-principle of the browser and let each operation (software with unique preference) create it&#8217;s own optimal interface and after that &#8211; open it up to server based activity. (which would be the same as allowing Keynote or Photoshop to work online).</p>
<p>As Forrester says: The browser is a page-by-page sequential way of browsing information, combine that with it&#8217;s lack of memory (except the back button of the browser), and the un-human way of how you communicate with it&#8217;s content (step-by-step, where everything else around us happens in motion) &#8211; we have to come up with better solutions. (Photosynth&#8217;s guardian example (show at TED) has some very interesting concepts)</p>
<p>I personally hope Gears, AIR and Silverlight is a step in the right direction. At the moment more exited about the possibilities than worried about Microsoft :o)</p>
<p>Thanks again for excellent post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

